×
Convivium was a project of Cardus 2011‑2022, and is preserved here for archival purposes.
Search
Search
The Richness of Well Wasted TimeThe Richness of Well Wasted Time

The Richness of Well Wasted Time

As the week and the summer draw to a close, Oxford scholar Carl Hildebrand takes time to reflect on Father Tim McCauley’s recent Convivium article about the need to reflect on how we engage with time. 

Carl Hildebrand
4 minute read

In a recent Convivium article, Fr. Tim McCauley draws our attention to the necessity of “wasting” time “in order to accomplish anything truly human” – like friendship, love, and contemplation. I’d like to join him in reflecting on several themes related to time and my experience of it as an academic.

In speaking of wasting time, McCauley encourages us to appreciate how our language and thinking about time are often shaped by the marketplace, or a way of thinking that turns people and things into instruments for some other purpose. After all, we regularly speak of spending time, investing in relationships, and so forth. In higher education, this other purpose is usually a successful career, or favor on the job market for those early in their career. In some cases the purpose can be education and intellectual achievement itself, or more insidiously, a professed higher vocation or spiritual calling. While these goals are good, they don’t justify treating certain things – especially people and relationships – as mere instruments. Yet sometimes our pursuit of these goals can push us to do just that and can make us blind to the intrinsic value of who and what is immediately around us. We can unconsciously turn ourselves into instruments as we (unconsciously) make ‘success’ our primary goal. So we need to think of ways we might check this tendency. With McCauley, I suggest that how we structure time can help us to do this.

Despite seeming a quaint anachronism, the academic calendar at Oxford helps to check the dominance of this instrumental or marketplace thinking. It’s organized around various feast days and celebrations observed by the Church of England (for example, the first term of the year is named Michaelmas after the Feast of St Michael and All Angels). These various feasts and celebrations are in many cases still celebrated in colleges. While most academics nowadays are overbooked and overworked, this calendar and the traditions that surround it encourage us to make room for leisure and genuine human connection.

While this calendar’s history and the setting in which it’s followed are unique, it’s not difficult to imagine how one might borrow ideas from it to organize time in a different setting. Of course, this needs to be done with attention to the setting one finds oneself in, and what may be possible in one setting may not be possible in another. But something as simple as time set aside to eat with one’s colleagues rather than alone at one’s desk can make space for this human connection. All the better if these routines enjoy institutional support. For a bold example, one company implemented an email “amnesty” for its employees between Christmas and New Year’s

In my college we have a formal dinner in the Great Hall several times a week. This tradition transforms something as routine as eating into an opportunity to delight in the company and conversation – in a word, the fellowship – of other students and academics. Complemented with time of quiet (often solitude) directed to study and reflection, this ordering of time has made my life on the whole much richer than it otherwise would be.

In this way, the calendar reminds me that time can be structured by something more friendly to human life than the drive to maximize some all-consuming good, whether that good be something like material wealth or, more subtly, academic success. Its rhythms make it a little easier for me to appreciate what McCauley describes as the “mysticism of the mundane” and I would describe as a heightened consciousness of the intrinsic value encountered in everyday life (often to do with people, relationships, and the beauty of what surrounds me). Ironically, I also think this arrangement of time has made me more productive.

Aristotle is known for emphasizing the value of leisure for intellectual inquiry. He distinguishes leisure from relaxation. Though relaxation is important, it doesn’t directly promote the deepest values that constitute a good human life – it’s more like a medication to ease weariness. Instead, he understands leisure as promoting these deeper values. In Book Seven of his Politics, he also holds that intellectual inquiry is the deepest value that contributes to a good life. I would emphasize friendship and communion with other people, including the divine, over intellectual inquiry, and we might add things to the list like creation and appreciation of beautiful things. But this is consistent with Aristotle’s point: his account of the importance of leisure is just as helpful with regard to these values as it is to intellectual inquiry.

On Aristotle’s account, leisure is meant to be productive by providing space for what really matters. A recent New York Times article pointed out how proximity, repeated unscheduled interactions, and an ability to let one’s guard down are conditions necessary for forming lasting friendships. It could be argued some form of leisure is necessary in meeting these conditions. Further, the rhythm of work and leisure that structure, in my case, college life can round out an education otherwise focused on extremely specialized research. In other words, how time is structured – with the Oxford calendar providing one example – can be conducive to education in a broad sense, as it opens the space we need to realize various deep human values.

Finally, on a slightly different note, it could be said that there is a moral imperative to devote part of one’s time to leisure. On the face of things, this idea might sound strange or incoherent, but it isn’t if we take Aristotle’s idea as a starting point. It’s easy for us to become passive to forces in our environment. This could include a workplace culture that encourages dishonesty with clients, or the political slant that dominates our Facebook feed. One way to resist this is to set aside time for being alone with one’s thoughts and for conversation with good friends. This is to allow time for reflection, to think critically and carefully about one’s values and commitments, and to listen to others who can see what you cannot. A person can’t do this without leisure.

In brief, I’m suggesting a person is wealthy when they devote time to communion with others, intellectual inquiry, and the appreciation of beauty, among other things. After all, wealth just is an abundance of valuable possessions and these things, though not possessions, are what are most valuable.

Convivium means living together. We welcome your voice to the conversation. Do you know someone who would enjoy this article? Send it to them now. Do you have a response to something we've published? Let us know!

Carl Hildebrand

Carl Hildebrand recently received his DPhil in philosophy from the University of Oxford. He currently teaches philosophy at the University of the Fraser Valley, in his hometown of Abbotsford, B.C.

You'll also enjoy...

Sea to Sea

Sea to Sea

Father Raymond J. de Souza tells Conservatives why they need more young people of faith in their ranks, and advises Toronto mayor to make some new friends.

My Great Grandfather

My Great Grandfather

For Jeff Lockert, President of Catholic Christian Outreach and a member of the Faith in Canada 150 Cabinet of Canadians, time with Grandpa Henry was always a brush with greatness.

God In My Everything

God In My Everything

Struck by the conviction of those around her that Ken Shigematsu’s book God in My Everything should be required reading for the contemporary Christian, Convivium’s Hannah Marazzi set out to have a conversation with the West Coast pastor and author.