×
Convivium was a project of Cardus 2011‑2022, and is preserved here for archival purposes.
Search
Search
Court's assisted-suicide ruling raises prospect of 'kill at will'Court's assisted-suicide ruling raises prospect of 'kill at will'

Court's assisted-suicide ruling raises prospect of 'kill at will'

The idea has quickly taken hold that the Supreme Court of Canada struck down a law prohibiting doctors from assisting at suicides. It did not, says Peter Stockland

Peter Stockland
1 minute read
The belief has grown since last Friday’s Supreme Court of Canada decision that we will have legalized doctor-assisted suicide by next year.
 
It’s a terribly mistaken assumption. We might have doctor-assisted suicide. We might just as easily have doctor, lawyer and local Hell’s Angel chieftain assisted suicide.
 
We might have an entirely lawless Canada as far as assisted suicide is concerned, what Calgary lawyer Gerry Chipeur refers to as “no country for old men.” Or middle-aged women. Or possibly even young children.
 
The misunderstanding of what might come arises from confusion over what the Supreme Court of Canada really decided. The idea has quickly taken hold that it struck down a law prohibiting doctors from assisting at suicides. It did not. It invalidated a law that prevents “everyone” — everyone — from assisting another person to commit suicide. The law also forbids anyone — anyone — from asking another person for help to commit suicide.
 
There is nothing in Section 241 of the federal Criminal Code about doctors.
 
Continue reading this article at the Calgary Herald website.

You'll also enjoy...

Quebec thumbs its nose at Supreme Court

Quebec thumbs its nose at Supreme Court

Meanwhile, the Quebec government had already passed legislation legalizing so-called medical assisted suicide, even though the Supreme Court has ruled that our constitutional separation of powers permits only the federal Parliament jurisdiction over the crafting of criminal law ...

Corporate Faith

Corporate Faith

Yet when the Supreme Court of Canada hears arguments next month in the dispute between Loyola High School and the government of Quebec, the implications will be at least as far reaching as TWU's bid to marry an evangelical Christian ethos with accreditation of our next generation of lawyers It is al...

The Liberty To Dissent

The Liberty To Dissent

Convivium Publisher Peter Stockland argues that freedom itself, not just the subset of religious freedom, is at stake in Friday’s Supreme Court of Canada decision regarding Trinity Western University.